In database design, not all entities can stand on their own. Some rely on other entities to make sense or to be uniquely identified. These are called weak entities. They are an important part of ER diagrams, especially when modeling real-world situations where certain data cannot exist without being linked to other data.
This guide will help you understand what weak entities are, how they differ from strong entities, and how to model them correctly. Whether you’re a student learning ER diagrams or a developer working on a database project, learning to use weak entities properly will improve the accuracy and structure of your data model.
What Is a Weak Entity in ER Diagrams
In database design, a weak entity is an entity that cannot be uniquely identified by its own attributes alone. This means that the data it contains isn’t enough to distinguish it from other entities of the same type.
Instead, a weak entity depends on a related strong entity (also called an owner entity) to give it identity. The combination of the weak entity’s attributes and the primary key of the strong entity uniquely identifies each instance of the weak entity.
Why is it called “weak”?
It’s called “weak” because it doesn’t have the strength (i.e., a complete set of unique attributes) to stand on its own. Without the associated strong entity, you wouldn’t be able to make sense of the weak entity’s data or uniquely identify its instances.
How weak entities are shown in ER diagrams
To accurately draw weak entities in an ER diagram, you use specific notation:
- Weak entity: The weak entity symbol is shown with a double rectangle.
- Identifying relationship: The link between weak and strong entities is shown with a double diamond.
Partial key attribute: Underlined with a dotted or dashed line.
Total participation: Shown using a double line between the weak entity and the identifying relationship.
These visual cues make it easy for viewers to recognize dependencies and the structure of the database.
Example of Weak Entity: Dependent in an Employee Database
To fully understand how weak entities work in ER diagrams, it helps to look at a real-world example. Weak entities are used when certain data items depend on another entity for their identification and existence. One common scenario involves storing information about an employee’s dependents—data that makes no sense without the employee it’s linked to. Let’s explore this example to see how weak entities are used in practice.
In a company database, you may want to store information about an employee’s dependents (such as a spouse or children) for benefits or HR purposes.
Entities involved:
Employee (Strong entity)
- Primary Key:
EmployeeID - Attributes:
Name,Department,Position, etc.
- Primary Key:
Dependent (Weak entity)
- Partial Key:
DependentName - Attributes:
DateOfBirth,Relationship - Composite Key:
EmployeeID + DependentName(to uniquely identify each dependent)
- Partial Key:
Why Dependent is a weak entity:
- A dependent cannot be uniquely identified by
DependentNamealone (many employees may have dependents with the same name). - It needs to be identified in the context of an employee.
- It has total participation in the relationship with Employee — a dependent cannot exist in the system without being associated with an employee.
- The identifying relationship (e.g., “HasDependent”) connects it to the Employee entity.
How it’s represented in an ER diagram:
- Dependent is shown as a double rectangle.
- The identifying relationship (“HasDependent”) is shown as a double diamond.
- A double line connects Dependent to HasDependent to show total participation.
- The partial key
DependentNameis underlined with a dashed line.
Characteristics of Weak Entities
Understanding what makes an entity “weak” is key to using it correctly in an ER diagram. Here’s a breakdown:
1. Lacks a primary key
Weak entities don’t have enough information on their own to form a unique identifier. For example, if we have a “Dependent” entity for employees, the dependent’s name alone might not be unique, because multiple employees might have dependents with the same name.
2. Existence depends on a strong entity
A weak entity cannot exist without being linked to a strong entity. Think of a hotel room – a “Room” can’t exist independently in a database without being associated with a specific “Hotel.”
If the parent entity (the hotel) is deleted, the dependent entity (the room) might also need to be deleted — this relationship is often modeled with cascading deletes in real-world database systems.
3. Has a partial key (also called a discriminator)
This is an attribute that identifies weak entities only when combined with the primary key of the associated strong entity.
Example: If two employees have a dependent named “John,” just “John” isn’t enough to identify the dependent. But combining “Employee ID” + “Dependent Name” does make it unique.
In ER diagrams, the partial key is underlined with a dashed line.
4. Total participation in identifying relationship
Every instance of a weak entity must be connected to a strong entity — this is called total participation. In the diagram, this is shown by double lines connecting the weak entity to the identifying relationship.
Without this connection, the weak entity can’t exist — so it must participate fully in that relationship.
Understanding the Partial Key in Weak Entities
A partial key (also called a discriminator) is an attribute or a set of attributes that helps uniquely identify instances of a weak entity—but only within the context of a related strong entity.
For example, in an employee-dependent relationship, DependentName might serve as the partial key for the weak entity Dependent. On its own, DependentName is not unique, but when combined with the EmployeeID from the strong entity Employee, it forms a composite key that uniquely identifies each dependent.
Key characteristics of a partial key:
- It is not sufficient on its own to act as a primary key.
- It is used together with the strong entity’s primary key to create a unique identifier.
- In ER diagrams, it is underlined with a dashed line to distinguish it from full primary keys.
Understanding how and when to use a partial key is essential for correctly modeling weak entities and maintaining referential integrity in your database design.
Strong Entities vs Weak Entities
In Entity-Relationship (ER) modeling, understanding the distinction between strong and weak entities is crucial for accurately representing real-world data relationships.
Strong Entities
A strong entity is an entity that can be uniquely identified by its own attributes. It possesses a primary key, which is a unique identifier for each instance of the entity. Strong entities are independent and do not rely on other entities for their identification or existence.
Weak Entities
A weak entity is an entity that cannot be uniquely identified by its own attributes alone. It lacks a primary key and depends on a related strong entity for its identification. Weak entities have a partial key that, when combined with the primary key of the related strong entity, uniquely identifies instances of the weak entity.
Key differences between strong and weak entities
| Feature | Strong Entity | Weak Entity |
| Primary Key | Has its own primary key | Lacks a primary key; has a partial key (discriminator) |
| Existence Dependency | Independent; can exist without other entities | Dependent; cannot exist without a related strong entity |
| Representation | Single rectangle in ER diagram | Double rectangle in ER diagram |
| Relationship Type | Regular relationship (single diamond) | Identifying relationship (double diamond) |
| Participation | May have total or partial participation in relationships | Always has total participation in identifying relationships |
Understanding identifying relationships
A weak entity is always associated with a strong entity through an identifying relationship. This relationship has specific characteristics:
- Total Participation: Every instance of the weak entity must be associated with a strong entity.
- Representation: Depicted by a double diamond in ER diagrams.
- Composite Key: The weak entity’s partial key combined with the strong entity’s primary key uniquely identifies instances of the weak entity.
Example:
- Strong Entity: Employee (Employee ID)
- Weak Entity: Dependent (Dependent Name)
- Identifying Relationship: “HasDependent” connecting Employee and Dependent
- Composite Key: Employee ID + Dependent Name
Modeling Weak Entities: Best Practices
Designing weak entities in an ER diagram requires thoughtful planning. Done right, they help reflect real-world dependencies and ensure the database stays organized and reliable. Done poorly, they can lead to confusion, redundancy, or data errors.
This section covers key design considerations and common pitfalls to help you model weak entities effectively.
Design considerations
1. Use only when necessary
Weak entities should be used only if they can’t be uniquely identified on their own.
A weak entity is appropriate when its existence and identity depend entirely on a related strong entity. If it has enough information to form its own unique key, it should be modeled as a strong entity instead.
2. Link to a strong entity
Every weak entity must be connected to a strong entity through an identifying relationship.
This relationship provides the context as the weak entity needs to be uniquely identified. Without this connection, the weak entity’s data is incomplete and invalid.
3. Show total participation
A weak entity must fully participate in the identifying relationship.
This means it cannot exist without the strong entity. In the ER diagram, show this using a double line between the weak entity and the relationship.
4. Highlight the partial key
Indicate the weak entity’s distinguishing attribute using a dashed underline.
This partial key, or discriminator, helps identify individual weak entities within the context of a specific strong entity (e.g., “Dependent Name” within an “Employee”).
5. Form a composite key
Combine the strong entity’s primary key with the weak entity’s partial key to create a unique identifier.
This is how weak entities are uniquely recognized in a relational model—by tying their identity directly to their strong counterpart.
6. Avoid standalone IDs
Do not give weak entities independent primary keys.
Assigning them standalone identifiers turns them into strong entities, which defeats the purpose of modeling them as weak.
7. Keep notation consistent
Use the same ER diagram symbols and formatting throughout your diagram for clarity.
This makes it easier for others to understand and work with your ER diagrams, especially in team environments or documentation.
Common pitfalls to avoid
1. Misidentifying weak entities
A common mistake is treating related entities as weak when they can actually stand on their own.
- A dependent, like
OrderItem, may be weak because items are only meaningful within a specific order. - But something like
Invoice—even though it belongs to aCustomer—may not be weak if it has a uniqueInvoice ID.
Always check whether the entity can have a standalone primary key before deciding it’s weak.
2. Assigning a primary key to a weak entity
By definition, weak entities do not have a full primary key on their own. If you assign a standalone primary key (like an ID), you’re treating it as a strong entity instead.
- Instead, form a composite key by combining:
- The primary key of the strong entity
- The partial key of the weak entity
Example: Employee ID + Dependent Name uniquely identifies a dependent.
3. Overcomplicating the model
Don’t overuse weak entities or create weak entities that rely on other weak entities without clear justification. This leads to:
- Confusing diagrams
- Difficult maintenance
- Poor database performance
Keep your ER diagrams simple, focused, and true to real-world relationships.
Conclusion: Understanding Weak Entities
A weak entity plays a key role in representing relationships where some data depends entirely on other data to exist. By understanding when and how to use them, you can create ER diagrams that more accurately reflect the real world and are easier to manage.
Always remember to use clear relationships, proper notation, and keep things simple. With the right approach, weak entities can help you design stronger, more reliable databases.
To make the modeling process easier and more visual, you can use a tool like Creately’s free ER diagram maker. It offers intuitive drag-and-drop features, smart connectors, and built-in templates that help you accurately represent weak entities and weak entity relationships, even in complex data models.
References
ResearchGate. (n.d.). (PDF) A Comparative Analysis of Entity-Relationship Diagrams. [online] Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/243781001_A_Comparative_Analysis_of_Entity-Relationship_Diagrams.
Balaban, M. and Peretz Shoval (1999). Resolving the ‘Weak Status’ of Weak Entity Types in Entity Relationship Schemas. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47866-3_25.
FAQs About Weak Entities
What is a discriminator in a weak entity?
Can a weak entity have multiple identifying relationships?
How are weak entities implemented in relational databases?
Can a weak entity have relationships with other entities?
Are weak entities always necessary in database design?
How do weak entities affect normalization?
Can a weak entity become a strong entity later?
